Monday, April 23, 2018

Goldman Sachs nails why banks are so excited about the technology...

Banks are going gaga for blockchain technology, the protocol developed to underpin bitcoin. It uses complex cryptography and a wide network of records — known as a "distributed ledger" — to eliminate the need for a central bank or middle man to regulate transactions. Banks have been swarming around the technology, with 42 investment banks signing up to an industry-wide group looking at how to use it and Goldman Sachs declaring in a note that it has the potential to change "well, everything." The conversation around this complex technology is pretty baffling, even to many of those involved. Everyone I speak to has a different way of describing it and the possibilities of what it could be used for are myriad. But Goldman has explained why banks are so excited, in its podcast on "The Digitization of Finance." Don Duet, co-head of the Technology Division at Goldman Sachs, nails it by describing not how blockchain works, but what it can do. Here what Duet says, as per an emailed transcript: You can see who had it, who owned it, the fact that they actually committed to each other electronically and signed it with cryptology to ensure that it was authorized. You could see all those things, and importantly, again, by having that all being done in a set of digital transactions, it enables it to happen in a much shorter time frame, so it also reduces a lot of what today are the delays which create other types of risk in the settlement cycles, which need to be compensated for in other forms.

So one of the big benefits is pretty simple — transparency. At the moment, things like share registered are siloed in institutions so if you want to find out who owns what, you have to put a query to that institution.

There are other problems too. Duet says: In order to facilitate the growth of our industry, much of that has been formed around concepts of having multiple sources or, you know, multiple parties owning a definition of truth, so the Bank of New York will own a big part of the reconciling of the ledger of who owns what stocks in the US, and so would other institutions around the world. But you end up where... you have this situation where you have multiple versions of the truth, which means that everyone needs to reconcile with each other to ensure that they all have the right set of information — who actually owns that asset, when did it get transferred — and it also creates a certain degree of just temporal delay. It’s not possible to be done right away. With the blockchain, that information is kept across multiple servers — the distributed ledger — all updated simultaneously and all you need to do is check out the blockchain. Much easier.

So the blockchain can reduce admin errors, make things faster, reduces costs, and reduce settlement risk for things like payments and trading. It seems as close as a win-win as you're going to get. But Duet raises an interesting point in the podcast: I think that, you know, you could ask the question of, well, why couldn't this have been designed before? And I think that that’s a very valid question. I think part of what we find, or I certainly find personally very exciting about this is just the awareness. I think the awareness that’s happened within the financial community that there is a technological answer that can help drive change and improve our system is just very encouraging.

Software is eating the world and it looks like it's finally eating finance.Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Dish could face $24 billion in fines for robocalls

Hypocrisy mars RMB devaluation debate

Author: Stephen Olson, Hinrich Foundation The verdict on China’s recent currency devaluations differs depending on who you listen to. To some, the devaluations are either...

Banks struggle to hit lending goal

Significant challenges remain for the banking industry to reach the annual credit growth target this year, despite certain improvement in lending situation, State...

Can Internationalization of the Renminbi Succeed where Internationalization of the Yen...

See original here: Can Internationalization of the Renminbi Succeed where Internationalization of the Yen Failed? The political unrest in the last quarter of 2009 will...

“Made in China” No More

Chinese companies are taking advantage of the EU debt crisis to make headway into Europe, targeting key sectors and regions, including shipping and ports in Greece, auto manufacturing in Eastern Europe, and banking and finance in London. By relocating production to Europe and securing a “Made in Europe” label, some firms hope to boost their reputations. Car manufacturer Great Wall Motors opened an assembly line in Bulgaria to produce cars exclusively for Europe. China wants to invest in “sectors that will boost its foreign trade, but also facilitate its international trade in general,” says Hervé Solignac Lecomte, head of international trade at HSBC France as reported by Anne Villechenon in the Guardian. Europeans could be more willing to sell assets to Chinese investors – and the spread of operations to Europe could also decentralize Chinese corporate decision-making. – YaleGlobal Chinese manufacturers look to escape image problem by qualifying for coveted Made in Europe labelAnne VillechenonThe Guardian, 15 May 2012This article originally appeared in Le Monde.      Rights:© 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

Fitch downgrades Hungary to junk status

Budapest: Fitch Ratings downgraded Hungary's credit grade to junk status on Friday, citing a standoff between the country and the European Union and the International Monetary Fund over rescue loans. Fitch, which followed similar moves from Moody's and S&P, kept a negative outlook, indicating a more than a 50 per cent chance for another downgrade within the next two years

China’s Real Estate Bubble May Have Just Popped

China’s real estate scene is reminiscent of the 2007 US market: developers are slashing prices and infuriating owners who paid top yuan for properties. Problems in the real estate market are extending into steel, banking, mining and other sectors. Vacant developments are numerous because wealthy Chinese savers have few alternatives for investing growing wealth. “Beijing's response to the global financial crisis added jet fuel to the fire,” writes Patrick Chovanec for Foreign Affairs, arguing that investors, not urban residents contributed to the bubble. “To maintain GDP growth of nearly ten percent during a massive downturn in global demand, China's leaders engineered a lending boom that expanded the country's money supply by roughly two-thirds.” Developers, after ignoring warnings to ease up on capacity, have urged the government to lift restrictions on owning multiple homes. By letting the bubble pop, the government could instantly create affordable housing for less affluent Chinese. – YaleGlobal Speculation, excess inventory, vacant developments, price reductions – a host of factors are set to undermine China’s real estate market and economic growth Patrick Chovanec Foreign Affairs, 26 December 2011 Rights:Copyright © 2002-2011 by the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.

SBV sets stricter rules on new bank establishment

The statements made by the State Bank of Vietnam recently make people understand that while Vietnam is still busy “putting the banking system in order,” it would nearly say “no” to the establishment of any new banks.